The difference between the gpl and the lgpl is that with the lgpl, the entire work doesnt have to have the same license. The license allows developers and companies to use and integrate a software component released under the lgpl into their own even proprietary software without being required by. In addition to the term work based on the program of gpl, lgpl version 2. As long the application is linked dynamically to lgpl software, the proprietary code can be kept proprietary. With the commercial license you also have access to the official qt support and close strategic relationship with the qt company to make sure your development goals are met. Legal issues are a constant source of questions and confusion. Qts commercial license is for when you wish to modify qts source code, and not release the changes you have made to the public.
Most software with licenses have restricted freedom when it comes to modifications and distribution, but gpl and lgpl take away those restrictions thus giving their users more leeway. The gnu lesser general public license lgpl is a free software license published by the free software foundation fsf. Ffmpeg is licensed under the gnu lesser general public license lgpl version 2. The product includes software licensed under gnu general public license. Applying lgpl to a library ensures that the library itself and any modified versions of it will remain open source. The agpl makes straightforward commercial sense we use it for our open source product, flint. Why should i use the gnu gpl rather than other free software licenses. Selection from understanding open source and free software licensing book. The lesser gpl lgpl is used primarily for software libraries. Originally lgpl was read out as library general public license. You may obtain the complete corresponding source code from us for a period of three years after our last shipment of this product, which will be no earlier than 20110801, by sending a money order or. It is also possible to modify the code under the condition that the resulting modification is released as source code under the lgpl with any binary distribution of.
Sony mobile offers to provide source code of software licensed under the gpl or lgpl or some other open source licenses allowing source code distribution to you on a. As long as were not linking directly towards the package, but rather just send or receive messages from it, that is. The license allows developers and companies to use and integrate a software component released under the lgpl into their own even proprietary software without being required by the terms of a strong copyleft license to release the source code of their own. Differences between gpl and lgpl when using licensed software. Other than the name change, the lesser gpl is substantially the same as the library gpl. Qts lgpl license relates to qt and qt only, so you can package your code and license it however you like, but unless you plan on buying a qt commercial license, you have to dynamically link to qt.
The usual disclaimers apply, this is not legal advice. So a futre consumer product licensing opensource software under gplv3 could not be protected in this way against device vulnerability. A lesser general public license lgpl is a license for opensource software that allows for provisions for including elements of free software in either free or proprietary software. To be more specific, im not redistributing software or anything, it would just be running on my product. The software included in this product contains ed software that is licensed under the gpl. You can use only those parts of qt that are under the lgpl and have no concerns about opensource. Well, this assumes that you are either selfemployed, or not employed under a contract such that your company owns your code.
Physically embedding an arduino board inside a commercial product does not require you to disclose or opensource any information about its design. Can i use jasper reports opensource library lgpl license. If you choose not to pay a fee and use the gplv3 license, you are required to release the source code of any program that you distribute. The gnu lesser general public license lgpl is a freesoftware license published by the free software foundation fsf. See how to choose a license for your own work for general recommendations about choosing a license for your work the gnu project has two principal licenses to use for libraries. The third alternative is to go with the gpl license, which will require your product to meet the gpl2 or gpl3 terms.
Deriving the design of a commercial product from the eagle files for an arduino board requires you to release the modified files under the same creative commons attribution sharealike license. Our commercial products include support and services. There is written in lgpl license that i can use not modified, linked code in commercial, closed product without changing license of product to lgpl. This license is a set of additional permissions added to version 3 of the gnu general public license. Insert the word lesser before general in all three places in the boilerplate notice to make sure that you refer to the gnu lgplv3 and not the gnu gplv3. What is the difference between gpl and lgpl in terms of. The licenses for most software and other practical works are designed to take away your freedom to share and change the works. Gary is correct there are no differences with respect to ownership. Describes the ability to use the software for commercial purposes. Public license does not permit incorporating your program into proprietary programs. A practical guide to gpl compliance software freedom law. Examples include the gnu allpermissive license, mit license, bsd licenses, apple public source license and apache license.
Derivatives works including modifications or anything statically linked to the library can only be redistributed under lgpl, but applications that use the library dont have. Sony mobile offers to provide source code of software licensed under. Otherwise, the programs maintainer may be the holder, or else could tell you how to contact the holder, so report it to the. Can i link a gpl program with a proprietary system library. Then tell the publisher or holder of the specific gplcovered program. The free software foundation recommends taking the additional step of adding a boilerplate notice to the top of each file. I assume they mean lesser as in less strong in forcing software to be open source. The license allows developers and companies to use and integrate a software component released under the lgpl into their own even proprietary software without being required by the terms of a strong copyleft license to release the source code of their own components. Using python module on lgpl license in commercial product. A copy of that license is included in this document on page x. If i understand it correctly, if we use a secret message format that we dont explain to anyone we. In contrast to lgpl, gpl requires that you provide the code for all changes made to the software.
Commercial licensees are not subject to the terms of the gpl v2 for example, the requirement to offer your product under the gpl v2 and make the source code of your application available to anyone who requests it. You may copy, distribute and modify the software provided that modifications are described and licensed for free under lgpl. Frequently asked questions about the gnu licenses gnu. A permissive software license, sometimes also called bsdlike or bsdstyle license, is a freesoftware license with minimal requirements about how the software can be redistributed. The boilerplate can be found at the end of the gnu gplv3 license. Difference between gpl and lgpl compare the difference. So im remaking a product and was approaching qt about the. Can i use jasper reports opensource library lgpl license with a commercial product. However you must license qt under the lgpl and discharge your responsibilities under that license. Sencha ext js is made available under commercial license or the gnu general public license version 3 gplv3. While you may download our software product under the lgpl free of charge, we also offer our.
Which means im not bound to release the code of the product, even if it. How can i legally use lgpl javascript in a commercial web site. The commercial qt license gives you the full rights to create and distribute software on your own terms without any open source license obligations. What you really need to know posted on march 26, 2015 september 11, 2018 by team level up steve ballmer, microsofts former ceo, infamously described open source software oss as a cancer that attaches itself in an intellectual property sense to everything it touches and viral, that last one. Why you shouldnt use the lesser gpl for your next library. For more information about how to release your own software under this license, please see our page of instructions.
The gpl, lgpl, and mozilla licenses understanding open. The rep was very insistent that i can not develop an internal prototype using the open source license and then move to the commercial license. We recommend that programs that use qt also acknowledge these contributions, and quote these license. The licenses directive must appear before the first build rule in the build file. The original ordinary gnu general public license gpl is nearly always. Proprietary software developers have the advantage of money. It has now been reinterpreted to be read out as the lesser general public license. Both licenses have the same intention, namely to protect the freedom of users to use and modify the software licensed under lgpl. The commercial license requires the payment of a fee for each designated user i. It keeps your code bona fide open source, so people who want to use and extend it noncommercially can do so without worrying about you at all.
Some features, such as support for some external libraries libx264 and libx265 for example and various filters, are covered by the gnu general public license gpl version 2 or later see commercial x264 license exception below. Gnu lesser general public license lgpl the gnu lesser general public license was originally named the library general public license. So im remaking a product and was approaching qt about the commercial version. It is also possible to modify the code under the condition that the resulting modification is released as source code under the lgpl with any binary distribution of your software that uses these lgpl parts. The agpl makes straightforward commercial sense we use it.
There are differences in the available modules between lgpl and gpl licensing. Preamble the gnu affero general public license is a free, copyleft license for software and other kinds of works, specifically designed to ensure cooperation with the community in the case of network server software. Lesser general public license is sometimes referred to as library gpl or gnu libraries, and some associate it with the idea of. Can i use an lgpllicenced library in my commercial app. The gpl licenses gplv3, gplv2, lgpl, affero gpl all contain some kind of sharealike license. This is an attempt to clarify the most important issues. Using gpl licensed packages in a commercial product ros. As of 2016, the most popular freesoftware license is the.
Qt contains some code that is not provided under the gnu lesser general public license lgpl or the qt commercial license, but rather under specific licenses from the original authors the qt company gratefully acknowledges these and other contributions to qt. From version 5, we have changed the license from lgpl to polyform noncommercial 1. It ought not force us to release all our own software in the product under the gpl. If that is the free software foundation, write to org. Moving to the issue of source publication, that is specifically, deliberately removed under lgpl lesser gpl, providing certain conditions are. If you were wondering whether you can use apache licensed code in your commercial applications and what do you need to do in order to comply with the license heres the unofficial simple ans short answer. If you have a commercial license, yes, you can incorporate x265 and distribute commercial products under the terms of that license. So that makes qt pretty unattractive to me since i have to pony up cash and hope its good. The lgpl basically requires read the full license and faq for details. There is no guarantee or warranty for the disclosed gpllgpl software per. Lgplv3 is the current version of the gnu lesser general public license. Frequently asked questions about the gnu licenses gnu project.
The gnu project has two principal licenses to use for libraries. The restrictions of including unedited lgpl software in your product are fairly simple. The lgpl prohibits sublicensing, yet each user that receives the software. It also contains a patent license and retaliation clause which is designed to prevent patents including patent trolls from encumbering the software project. You can get a commercial license which allows you to do everything with qt with no concerns about opensource. In combination with the polyform noncommercial license we sell licenses for customers who use epplus in a commercial business. The lgpl license allows an application that references the binaries to remain closedsource. Why you shouldnt use the lesser gpl for your next library gnu. Our product, the ffmpeg enabler, includes ffmpeg libraries licensed under lgpl. Well, it depends on the type of the license and the way that the proprietary program interacts with the free software.
If you are not sure whether the lgpl is right for you, you can always test our software under the lgpl and inspect the source code before you contact us about purchasing a commercial license. Gpl vs lgpl gpl and lgpl are software licenses that protect the freedom of the users to share andor change open source software. There are some portions of qt that are only available under the commercial license. Support to any codecs using gpl licensed software was disabled, so it can be used to create proprietary software without gpl restrictions. Also, theres nothing preventing you from selling an open source. I see that the lgpl covers arduino stuff, but after digging around on the internet, i cant really get a clear view on what exactly id need to release to the public if anything to comply with the lgpl license. I worked for trolltech, and then later nokia who bought t. Asf 3rd party license policy apache software foundation.
309 1449 314 1111 1548 802 379 1381 1342 1491 1096 941 1264 117 24 220 1225 1475 1449 418 1630 1569 1411 823 353 91 254 1587 957 716 1626 53 267 185 445 124 1239 581 275 334 1002 799 499 468 1448 544